Many people believe that film adaptations of classic literary items can never match the books on which they are based. Through several arguments, I would like to present that film adaptations can never match books and cannot replace them.
The first argument is that it takes us less time to watch a movie adaptation than to read the whole book. This is good for people who are busy and don't have enough time to read a book but prefer to watch a movie.
Secondly, the film adaptation is easier to understand than the book, because the wording is simpler and we can remember all the scenes better through the image we see.
The argument against is that reading books develops. We stimulate our imagination, learn difficult words and spelling. However, this cannot be said about films.
Another thing is that reading we know a lot of important details, which are usually omitted in film adaptation, because the director wants to fit in time. Because of that we don't know half of the book and we don't know how it really was.
The last argument is that the books are great. Maybe they take a long time to read, and watching a movie saves a lot of time. But nothing gives more pleasure than finishing a book. There are so many emotions in it. Each character has different experiences and we can get to know them. Reading, we get deeper into the matchmaking, presented in the reading.
I think that film adaptation will never equal and replace the book, because reading teaches us, develops, we know how the plot really goes. While reading we experience various emotions, and books can very often move us. Daniel Ślusarczyk 3ATL
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz